Paper detail

Fragility of multi-junction flux qubits against quasiparticle tunneling

We study decoherence in superconducting qubits due to quasiparticle tunneling which is enhanced by two known deviations from the equilibrium BCS theory. The first process corresponds to tunneling of an already existing quasiparticle across the junction. The quasiparticle density is increased, e.g., because of an effective quasiparticle doping of the system. The second process is quasiparticle tunneling by breaking of a Cooper pair. This can happen at typical energies of superconducting qubits if there is an extended quasiparticle density inside the gap. We calculate the induced energy decay and pure dephasing rates in typical qubit designs. Assuming the lowest reported value of the non-equilibrium quasiparticle density in Aluminum, we find for the persistent-current flux qubit decay times of the order of recent measurements. Using the typical sub-gap density of states in Niobium we also reproduce observed decay times in the corresponding Niobium flux qubits.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.