Paper detail

Fragile-to-Strong Crossover, growing length scales, and dynamic heterogeneity in Wigner Glasses

Colloidal particles, which are ubiquitous, have become ideal testing grounds for the structural glass transition (SGT) theories. In these systems glassy behavior is manifested as the density of the particles is increased. Thus, soft colloidal particles with varying degree of softness capture diverse glass forming properties, observed normally in molecular glasses. By performing Brownian dynamics simulations for a binary mixture of micron-sized charged colloidal suspensions, known to form Wigner glasses, we show that by tuning the softness of the potential, achievable by changing the monovalent salt concentration, there is a continuous transition between fragile to strong behavior. Remarkably, this is found in a system where the well characterized potential between the colloidal particles is isotropic. We also show that the predictions of the random first order transition (RFOT) theory quantitatively describes the universal features such as the growing correlation length, $ξ\sim (ϕ_K/ϕ- 1)^{-ν}$ with $ν= 2/3$ where $ϕ_K$, the analogue of the Kauzmann temperature, depends on the salt concentration. As anticipated by the RFOT predictions, we establish a causal relationship between the growing correlation length and a steep increase in the relaxation time and dynamic heterogeneity. The broad range of fragility observed in Wigner glasses is used to draw analogies with molecular glasses. The large variations in the fragility is found only when the temperature dependence of the viscosity is examined for a large class of diverse glass forming materials. In sharp contrast, this is vividly illustrated in a single system that can be experimentally probed. Our work also shows that the RFOT predictions are accurate in describing the dynamics over the entire density range, regardless of the fragility of the glasses, implying that the physics describing the SGT is universal.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.