Paper detail

Fracture resistance of zigzag single walled carbon nanotubes

Brittle fracture is one of the important failure modes of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube (SWNT) due to mechanical loading. In this paper, the fracture resistance of zigzag SWNTs with preexisting defects is calculated using fracture mechanics concepts based on atomistic simulations. The problem of unstable crack growth at finite temperature, presumably caused by lattice trapping effect, is circumvented by computing the strain energy release rate through a series of displacement-controlled tensile loading of SWNTs (applied through moving the outermost layer of atoms at one end at constant strain rate of 9.4x10-4/ps) with pre-existing crack-like defects of various lengths. The strain energy release rate, G, is computed for (17,0), (28,0) and (35,0) SWNTs (each with aspect ratio 4) with pre-existing cracks up to 29.5Å long. The fracture resistance, Gc, is determined as a function of crack length for each tube at three different temperatures (1K, 300K and 500K). A significant dependence of Gc on crack length is observed reminiscent of the rising R curve behavior of metals at the macroscale: for the zigzag nanotubes Gc increases with crack length at small length, and tends to reach a constant value if the tube diameter is large enough. We suspect that the lattice trapping effect plays the role of crack tip plasticity at the atomic scale. For example, at 300 Kelvin, Gc for the (35,0) tube with aspect ratio 4 converges to 6 Joule/m2 as the crack length exceeds 20 Angstrom. This value is comparable with the fracture toughness of graphite and Silicon. The fracture resistance of the tubes is found to decrease significantly as the temperature increases. To study the length effects, the computations are repeated for zigzag nanotubes with the same three chiralities but with aspect ratio 8 at 1K.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.