Paper detail

Fractional yields inferred from halo and thick disk stars

Linear [Q/H]-[O/H] relations, Q = Na, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni, are inferred from a sample (N=67) of recently studied FGK-type dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood including different populations. Regression line slope and intercept estimators and related variance estimators are determined. With regard to the straight line, [Q/H] = aQ [O/H] + bQ, sample stars display along a "main sequence", [Q,O] = [aQ,bQ, Delta bQ], leaving aside the two OL stars which, in most cases (e.g., Na), lie outside. A unit slope, aQ = 1, implies Q is a primary element synthesised via SNII progenitors in presence of universal stellar initial mass function (defined as simple primary element). To this respect, Mg, Si, Ti, show aQ = 1 within 2 sigma(aQ); Cr, Fe, Ni, within 3 sigma(aQ); Na, Ca, exceeding 3 sigma(aQ). The empirical, differential element abundance distributions are inferred from different subsamples, where related regression lines represent their theoretical counterparts within the framework of simple MCBR (multistage closed box + reservoir) chemical evolution models. Hence the fractional yields are determined and (as an example) a comparison is shown with their theoretical counterparts inferred from SNII progenitor nucleosynthesis under the assumption of a power-law stellar initial mass function. The generalized fractional yields are determined regardless from the chemical evolution model. The ratio of outflow to star formation rate is compared for different populations, in the framework of simple MCBR models. The opposite situation of element abundance variation entirely due to cosmic scatter is also considered under reasonable assumptions. The related differential element abundance distribution fits to the data as well as its counterpart inferred in the opposite limit of instantaneous mixing in presence of chemical evolution.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.