Paper detail

Fractional semilinear Neumann problems arising from a fractional Keller--Segel model

We consider the following fractional semilinear Neumann problem on a smooth bounded domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, $n\geq2$, $$\begin{cases} (-\varepsilonΔ)^{1/2}u+u=u^{p},&\hbox{in}~Ω,\\ \partial_νu=0,&\hbox{on}~\partialΩ,\\ u>0,&\hbox{in}~Ω, \end{cases}$$ where $\varepsilon>0$ and $1<p<(n+1)/(n-1)$. This is the fractional version of the semilinear Neumann problem studied by Lin--Ni--Takagi in the late 80's. The problem arises by considering steady states of the Keller--Segel model with nonlocal chemical concentration diffusion. Using the semigroup language for the extension method and variational techniques, we prove existence of nonconstant smooth solutions for small $\varepsilon$, which are obtained by minimizing a suitable energy functional. In the case of large $\varepsilon$ we obtain nonexistence of nonconstant solutions. It is also shown that as $\varepsilon\to0$ the solutions $u_\varepsilon$ tend to zero in measure on $Ω$, while they form spikes in $\overlineΩ$. The regularity estimates of the fractional Neumann Laplacian that we develop here are essential for the analysis. The latter results are of independent interest.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.