Paper detail

Fractional perimeter from a fractal perspective

Following \cite{Visintin}, we exploit the fractional perimeter of a set to give a definition of fractal dimension for its measure theoretic boundary. We calculate the fractal dimension of sets which can be defined in a recursive way and we give some examples of this kind of sets, explaining how to construct them starting from well known self-similar fractals. In particular, we show that in the case of the von Koch snowflake $S\subset\mathbb R^2$ this fractal dimension coincides with the Minkowski dimension, namely \begin{equation*} P_s(S)<\infty\qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad s\in\Big(0,2-\frac{\log4}{\log3}\Big). \end{equation*} We also study the asymptotics as $s\to1^-$ of the fractional perimeter of a set having finite (classical) perimeter.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.