Paper detail

Fractional matchings, component-factors and edge-chromatic critical graphs

The first part of the paper studies star-cycle factors of graphs. It characterizes star-cycle factors of a graph $G$ and proves upper bounds for the minimum number of $K_{1,2}$-components in a $\{K_{1,1}, K_{1,2}, C_n\colon n\ge 3\}$-factor of a graph $G$. Furthermore, it shows where these components are located with respect to the Gallai-Edmonds decomposition of $G$ and it characterizes the edges which are not contained in any $\{K_{1,1}, K_{1,2}, C_n\colon n\ge 3\}$-factor of $G$. The second part of the paper proves that every edge-chromatic critical graph $G$ has a $\{K_{1,1}, K_{1,2}, C_n\colon n\ge 3\}$-factor, and the number of $K_{1,2}$-components is bounded in terms of its fractional matching number. Furthermore, it shows that for every edge $e$ of $G$, there is a $\{K_{1,1}, K_{1,2}, C_n\colon n\ge 3\}$-factor $F$ with $e \in E(F)$. Consequences of these results for Vizing's critical graph conjectures are discussed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.