Paper detail

Fractal Dimension and the Persistent Homology of Random Geometric Complexes

We prove that the fractal dimension of a metric space equipped with an Ahlfors regular measure can be recovered from the persistent homology of random samples. Our main result is that if $x_1,\ldots, x_n$ are i.i.d. samples from a $d$-Ahlfors regular measure on a metric space, and $E^0_α\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right)$ denotes the $α$-weight of the minimum spanning tree on $x_1,\ldots,x_n:$ \[E_α^0\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right)=\sum_{e\in T\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right)} |e|^α\,,\] then there exist constants $0<C_1\leq C_2$ so that \[C_1\leq n^{-\frac{d-α}{d}} E^0_α\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right)\leq C_2\,\] with high probability as $n\rightarrow \infty.$ In particular, \[\log\big(E^0_α(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\big)/\log(n)\longrightarrow (d-α)/d\,.\] This is a generalization of a result of Steele (1988) from the non-singular case to the fractal setting. Our result is best possible, in the sense that there exist Ahlfors regular measures for which the limit $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} n^{-\frac{d-α}{d}} E^0_α\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right)$ does not exist with high probability. We also prove analogous results for weighted sums defined in terms of higher dimensional persistent homology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.