Paper detail

FPGA Based Implementation of Distributed Minority and Majority Voting Based Redundancy for Mission and Safety-Critical Applications

Electronic circuits and systems used in mission and safety-critical applications usually employ redundancy in the design to overcome arbitrary fault(s) or failure(s) and guarantee the correct operation. In this context, the distributed minority and majority voting based redundancy (DMMR) scheme forms an efficient alternative to the conventional N-modular redundancy (NMR) scheme for implementing mission and safety-critical circuits and systems by significantly minimizing their weight and design cost and also their design metrics whilst providing a similar degree of fault tolerance. This article presents the first FPGAs based implementation of example DMMR circuits and compares it with counterpart NMR circuits on the basis of area occupancy and critical path delay viz. area-delay product (ADP). The example DMMR circuits and counterpart NMR circuits are able to accommodate the faulty or failure states of 2, 3 and 4 function modules. For physical synthesis, two commercial Xilinx FPGAs viz. Spartan 3E and Virtex 5 corresponding to 90nm and 65nm CMOS processes, and two radiation-tolerant and military grade Xilinx FPGAs viz. QPro Virtex 2 and QPro Virtex E corresponding to 150nm and 180nm CMOS processes were considered for the NMR and DMMR circuit realizations which employ the 4-by-4 array multiplier as a representative function module. To achieve a fault tolerance of 2 function modules, both the DMMR and the NMR schemes provide near similar mean ADPs across all the four FPGAs. But while achieving a fault tolerance of 3 function modules the DMMR features reduced ADP by 44.5% on average compared to the NMR, and in achieving a fault tolerance of 4 function modules the DMMR reports reduced ADP by 56.5% on average compared to the NMR with respect to all the four FPGAs considered.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.