Paper detail

Fourier power spectra at high frequencies: a way to distinguish a neutron star from a black hole

We analyzed the power density spectra of a sample of 9 neutron star and 9 black hole binaries in the low/hard spectral state. In the power density spectra of accreting neutron stars with a weak magnetic field a significant power is contained at frequencies close to one kHz. At the same time, most Galactic accreting black holes demonstrate a strong decline in the power spectra at the frequencies higher than 10--50 Hz. We propose to use this empirical fact as a method to distinguish the accreting neutron stars from black holes in X-ray transients. The X-ray transients that demonstrate significant noise in their X-ray flux at frequencies above ~500 Hz should be considered neutron stars. We propose to explain the observed difference as a result of the existence of a radiation dominated spreading layer on the neutron star surface (Inogamov & Sunyaev 1999). The possible very high frequency variabilities of this layer are discussed.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.