Paper detail

Fourier dimension of conical and cylindrical hypersurfaces

The notions of Hausdorff and Fourier dimensions are ubiquitous in harmonic analysis and geometric measure theory. It is known that any hypersurface in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ has Hausdorff dimension $d$. However, the Fourier dimension depends on the finer geometric properties of the hypersurface. For instance, the Fourier dimension of a hyperplane is 0, and the Fourier dimension of a hypersurface with non-vanishing Gaussian curvature is $d$. Recently, Harris has shown that the Euclidean light cone in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ has Fourier dimension $d-1$, which leads one to conjecture that the Fourier dimension of a hypersurface equals the number of non-vanishing principal curvatures. We prove this conjecture for all $d$-dimensional cones and cylinders in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ generated by hypersurfaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with non-vanishing Gaussian curvature. In particular, cones and cylinders are not Salem. Our method involves substantial generalizations of Harris's strategy.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.