Paper detail

Fourier analysis of Fe I lines in the spectra of the Sun, α Centauri A, Procyon, Arcturus, and Canopus

We used spectral observations of Fe I line profiles with a 200 000 resolution to determine micro and macroturbulent velocities in the atmospheres of the Sun as a star, α Cen A, Procyon (α CMi), Arcturus (α Boo), and Canopus (α Car). Isotropic microturturbulent velocities (V_mi) and radial-tangential macroturbulent velocities (V_ma,RT) were found to be a quite suitable approximation to the velocity field in the atmospheres of all stars studied except Canopus. The average velocities V_mi and V_ma,RT are 0.8 +/- 0.1 and 2.6 +/- 0.3 km/s for the Sun as a star, 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 2.9 +/- 0.4 km/s for α Cen A, 0.8 +/- 0.3 and 5.9 +/- 0.2 km/s for Procyon, 1.0 +/- 0.2 and 4.6 +/- 0.3 km/s for Arcturus. The velocity field in the atmosphere of Canopus can be described by an anisotropic radial-tangential distribution of microturbulence with V_mi,RT = 2.1 km/s and anisotropic distribution of macroturbulence with V_ma,rad = 17 +/- 2 km/s and V_ma,tan = 1.3 +/- 1.0 km/s. From Fourier analysis of broadening and shapes of three spectral lines of Fe I, we have derived the rotation velocity V_e sini = 3.5 +/- 0.2 km/s for Canopus.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.