Paper detail

Fountain Codes with Nonuniform Selection Distributions through Feedback

One key requirement for fountain (rateless) coding schemes is to achieve a high intermediate symbol recovery rate. Recent coding schemes have incorporated the use of a feedback channel to improve intermediate performance of traditional rateless codes; however, these codes with feedback are designed based on uniformly at random selection of input symbols. In this paper, on the other hand, we develop feedback-based fountain codes with dynamically-adjusted nonuniform symbol selection distributions, and show that this characteristic can enhance the intermediate decoding rate. We provide an analysis of our codes, including bounds on computational complexity and failure probability for a maximum likelihood decoder; the latter are tighter than bounds known for classical rateless codes. Through numerical simulations, we also show that feedback information paired with a nonuniform selection distribution can highly improve the symbol recovery rate, and that the amount of feedback sent can be tuned to the specific transmission properties of a given feedback channel.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.