Paper detail

Fossil imprint of a powerful flare at the Galactic Centre along the Magellanic Stream

The Fermi satellite discovery of the gamma-ray emitting bubbles extending 50 deg (10 kpc) from the Galactic Centre has revitalized earlier claims that our Galaxy has undergone an explosive episode in the recent past. We now explore a new constraint on such activity. The Magellanic Stream is a clumpy gaseous structure passing over the South Galactic Pole (SGP) at a distance of at least 50-100 kpc. Patchy H-alpha emission discovered along the Magellanic Stream over the SGP is a factor of 5 too bright to have been produced by the Galactic stellar population. Time-dependent models of Stream clouds exposed to a flare in ionising photon flux show that the ionised gas must recombine and cool for a time interval 0.6 - 2.9 Myr for the emitted H-alpha surface brightness to drop to the observed level. A nuclear starburst is ruled out. Sgr A* is a more likely candidate because it is two orders of magnitude more efficient at converting gas to UV radiation. The central black hole (4 x 10^6 Msun) can supply the required ionising luminosity with a fraction of the Eddington accretion rate (3-30%). In support of nuclear activity, the H-alpha emission along the Stream has a polar angle dependence peaking close to the SGP. Moreover, it is now generally accepted that the Stream over the SGP must be further than the Magellanic Clouds. At the lower halo gas densities, shocks become too ineffective and are unlikely to give rise to a polar angle dependence in the H-alpha emission. Thus it is likely that the Stream emission arose from a `Seyfert flare' that was active 1-3 Myr ago, consistent with the cosmic ray lifetime in the Fermi bubbles. Sgr A* activity today is greatly suppressed (70-80 dB) relative to the Seyfert outburst...

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.