Paper detail

Forward--Backward Splitting with Deviations for Monotone Inclusions

We propose and study a weakly convergent variant of the forward--backward algorithm for solving structured monotone inclusion problems. Our algorithm features a per-iteration deviation vector which provides additional degrees of freedom. The only requirement on the deviation vector to guarantee convergence is that its norm is bounded by a quantity that can be computed online. This approach provides great flexibility and opens up for the design of new and improved forward--backward-based algorithms, while retaining global convergence guarantees. These guarantees include linear convergence of our method under a metric subregularity assumption without the need to adapt the algorithm parameters. Choosing suitable monotone operators allows for incorporating deviations into other algorithms, such as Chambolle--Pock and Krasnoselsky--Mann iterations. We propose a novel inertial primal--dual algorithm by selecting the deviations along a momentum direction and deciding their size using the norm condition. Numerical experiments demonstrate our convergence claims and show that even this simple choice of deviation vector can improve the performance, compared, e.g., to the standard Chambolle--Pock algorithm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.