Paper detail

Forming Planetesimals by Gravitational Instability: II. How Dust Settles to its Marginally Stable State

Dust at the midplane of a circumstellar disk can become gravitationally unstable and fragment into planetesimals if the local dust-to-gas density ratio mu is sufficiently high. We simulate how dust settles in passive disks and ask how high mu can become. We settle the dust using a 1D code and test for dynamical stability using a 3D shearing box code. This scheme allows us to explore the behavior of small particles having short but non-zero stopping times in gas: 0 < t_stop << the orbital period. The streaming instability is thereby filtered out. Dust settles until shearing instabilities in the edges of the dust layer threaten to overturn the entire layer. In this state of marginal stability, mu=2.9 for a disk whose bulk (height-integrated) metallicity is solar. For a disk whose bulk metallicity is 4x solar, mu reaches 26.4. These maximum values of mu, which depend on the background radial pressure gradient, are so large that gravitational instability of small particles is viable in disks whose bulk metallicities are just a few (<4) times solar. Earlier studies assumed that dust settles until the Richardson number Ri is spatially constant. Our simulations are free of this assumption but provide support for it within the dust layer's edges, with the proviso that Ri increases with bulk metallicity in the same way that we found in Paper I. Only modest enhancements in bulk metallicity are needed to spawn planetesimals directly from small particles.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.