Paper detail

Formation versus destruction: the evolution of the star cluster population in galaxy mergers

(Abridged) Interacting galaxies are well-known for their high star formation rates and rich star cluster populations, but the rapidly changing tidal field can also efficiently destroy clusters. We use numerical simulations of merging disc galaxies to investigate which mechanism dominates. The simulations include a model for the formation and dynamical disruption of the entire star cluster population. We find that the dynamical heating of clusters by tidal shocks is about an order of magnitude higher in interacting galaxies than in isolated galaxies. This is driven by the increased gas density, and is sufficient to destroy star clusters at a higher rate than new clusters are formed: the total number of clusters in the merger remnant is 2-50% of the amount in the progenitor discs, with low-mass clusters being disrupted preferentially. By adopting observationally motivated selection criteria, we find that the observed surplus of star clusters in nearby merging galaxies is caused by the bias to detect young, massive clusters. We provide a general expression for the survival fraction of clusters, which increases with the gas depletion time-scale. Due to the preferential disruption of low-mass clusters, the mass distribution of the surviving star clusters in a merger remnant develops a peak at a mass of about 10^3 Msun, which evolves to higher masses at a rate of 0.3-0.4 dex per Gyr. The peak mass initially depends weakly on the galactocentric radius, but this correlation disappears as the system ages. We discuss the similarities between the cluster populations of the simulated merger remnants and (young) globular cluster systems. Our results suggest that the combination of cluster formation and destruction should be widespread in the dense star-forming environments at high redshifts, which could provide a natural origin to present-day globular cluster systems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.