Paper detail

Formation of Turbulent and Magnetized Molecular Clouds via Accretion Flows of HI Clouds

Using 3D MHD simulation with the effects of radiative cooling/heating, chemical reactions, and thermal conduction, we investigate the formation of molecular cloud in the ISM. We consider the formation of molecular cloud by accretion of the HI clouds as suggested in recent observations. The simulation shows that the initial HI medium is compressed and piled up behind the shock waves induced by the accretion flows. Since the initial medium is highly inhomogeneous as a consequence of the thermal instability, the formed molecular cloud becomes very turbulent owing to the development of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. The structure of the post shock region is composed of dense cold gas (T<100 K) and diffuse warm gas (T>1,000 K), which are spatially well mixed owing to the turbulence. Because the energy source of the turbulence is the accretion flows, the turbulence is highly anisotropic biased toward the direction of accretion flows. The kinetic energy of the turbulence dominates the thermal, magnetic, and gravitational energies in the total 10 Myr evolution. However, the kinetic energy measured by using the CO-fraction-weighted density is comparable to the other energies. This suggests that the true kinetic energy of turbulence in molecular cloud as a hole can be much larger than the kinetic energy of turbulence estimated by line-width of molecular emissions. The clumps in the molecular cloud show statistically homogeneous evolution as follows: The typical plasma beta of the clumps is roughly constant <beta>~ 0.4. The size-velocity dispersion relation show dv ~ 1.5 km s^{-1} (l/1 pc)^{0.5}, irrespective of the density. The clumps evolve toward magnetically supercritical, gravitationally unstable cores. The clumps seem to evolve into cores that satisfy the condition for fragmentation into binary. These statistical properties may provide the initial condition of star formation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.