Paper detail

Formation of the Asymmetric Accretion Disk from Stellar Wind Accretion in an S-type Symbiotic Star

The accretion process in a typical S-type symbiotic star, targeting~AG Draconis, is investigated through 3D hydrodynamical simulations using the FLASH code. Regardless of the wind velocity of the giant star, an accretion disk surrounding the white dwarf is always formed. In the wind models faster than the orbital velocity of the white dwarf, the disk size and accretion rate are consistent with the predictions under the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton (BHL) condition. In slower wind models, unlike the BHL predictions, the disk size does not grow and the accretion rate increases to a considerably higher level, up to $>20\%$ of the mass-loss rate of the giant star. The accretion disk in our fiducial model is characterized by a flared disk with a radius of 0.16~au and a scale height of 0.03 au. The disk mass of $\sim 5 \times 10^{-8} M_\odot$ is asymmetrically distributed with the density peak toward the giant star, being about $50\%$ higher than the density minimum in the disk. Two inflowing spiral features are clearly identified and their relevance to the azimuthal asymmetry of disk is pointed out. The flow in the accretion disk is found to be sub-Keplerian with about $90\%$ of the Keplerian speed, which indicates the caveat of overestimating the O VI emission region from spectroscopy of Raman-scattered O VI features at 6825 Å and 7082 Å.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.