Paper detail

Formation of Multiple Populations in Globular Clusters: Another Possible Scenario

While chemical composition spreads are now believed to be a universal characteristic of globular clusters (GCs), not all of them present multiple populations in their color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs). Here we present a new scenario for the formation of GCs, in an attempt to qualitatively explain this otherwise intriguing observational framework. Our scenario divides GCs into three groups, depending on the initial mass (M_I) of the progenitor structure (PS), as follows. i) Massive PSs can retain the gas ejected by massive stars, including the ejecta of core-collapse SNe. ii) Intermediate-mass PSs can retain at least a fraction of the fast winds of massive stars, but none of the core-collapse SNe ejecta. iii) Low-mass PSs can only retain the slow winds of intermediate-mass stars. Members of the first group would include omega Centauri (NGC 5139), M54 (NGC 6715), M22 (NGC 6656), and Terzan 5, whereas NGC 2808 (and possibly NGC 2419) would be members of the second group. The remaining GCs which only present a spread in light elements, such as O and Na, would be members of the third group. According to our scenario, the different components in omega Cen should not display a sizeable spread in age. We argue that this is consistent with the available observations. We give other simple arguments in favor of our scenario, which can be described in terms of two main analytical relations: i) Between the actual observed ratio between first and second generation stars (R_SG^FG) and the fraction of first generation stars that have been lost by the GC (S_L); and ii) Between S_L and M_I. We also suggest a series of future improvements and empirical tests that may help decide whether the proposed scenario properly describes the chemical evolution of GCs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.