Paper detail

Formation of mass gap objects in highly asymmetric mergers

The LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (LVC) recently reported the detection of GW190814, a merger of a $23^{+1.0}_{-0.9}~M_{\odot}$ primary black hole (BH), and a $2.6^{+0.08}_{-0.08}~M_{\odot}$ secondary. The secondary's mass falls into the mass-gap regime, which refers to the scarcity of compact objects in the mass range of 2-5 $M_{\odot}$. The first clue to the formation of the GW190814 lies in the fact that the primary is a very massive BH. We suggest that the secondary was born as a neutron star (NS) where a significant amount of the supernova ejecta mass from its formation remained bound to the binary due to the presence of the massive BH companion. The bound mass forms a circumbinary accretion disk, and its accretion onto the NS created a mass-gap object. In this scenario, LIGO/Virgo will only detect mass-gap objects in binary mergers with an extreme mass ratio. We also predict a correlation between the mass of the secondary and the mass of the primary in such asymmetric mergers. Our model can be tested with future data from the LVC's third-observing run.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.