Paper detail

Formation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, dredge-up and $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap

Pair-instability (PI) is expected to open a gap in the mass spectrum of black holes (BHs) between $\approx{}40-65$ M$_\odot$ and $\approx{}120$ M$_\odot$. The existence of the mass gap is currently being challenged by the detection of GW190521, with a primary component mass of $85^{+21}_{-14}$ M$_{\odot}$. Here, we investigate the main uncertainties on the PI mass gap: the $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O reaction rate and the H-rich envelope collapse. With the standard $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O rate, the lower edge of the mass gap can be 70 M$_\odot$ if we allow for the collapse of the residual H-rich envelope at metallicity $Z\leq{}0.0003$. Adopting the uncertainties given by the STARLIB database, for models computed with the $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O rate $-1\, σ$, we find that the PI mass gap ranges between $\approx{}80$ M$_\odot$ and $\approx{}150$ M$_\odot$. Stars with $M_{\rm ZAMS}>110$ M$_\odot$ may experience a deep dredge-up episode during the core helium-burning phase, that extracts matter from the core enriching the envelope. As a consequence of the He-core mass reduction, a star with $M_{\rm ZAMS} =160$ M$_\odot$ may avoid the PI and produce a BH of 150 M$_\odot$. In the $-2\,{}σ$ case, the PI mass gap ranges from 92 M$_\odot$ to 110 M$_\odot$. Finally, in models computed with $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O $-3\,{}σ$, the mass gap is completely removed by the dredge-up effect. The onset of this dredge-up is particularly sensitive to the assumed model for convection and mixing. The combined effect of H-rich envelope collapse and low $^{12}$C($α$, $γ$)$^{16}$O rate can lead to the formation of BHs with masses consistent with the primary component of GW190521.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.