Paper detail

Formation of an embryonic supermassive star in the first galaxy

We studied the gravitational collapse of a warm (~8000 K) primordial-gas cloud as a candidate progenitor for a supermassive star (SMS; >10^5 Msun) using a three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulation, including all the relevant cooling processes of both H_2 and H, which can potentially induce cloud fragmentation. This is the first simulation of this kind to resolve protostar formation. We find that the cloud undergoes runaway collapse without a major episode of fragmentation. Although the H_2 fraction jumps by a large factor via the three-body reaction at ~10^-13 g/cm^3, its cooling remains inefficient due to the optical thickness, and the temperature remains >3000 K. When the central core of the cloud becomes opaque to continuum radiation at ~10^-8 g/cm^3, a hydrostatic protostar with ~0.2 Msun is formed. The protostar grows to the mass ~1 Msun and the radius ~2 AU within ~1 yr via rapid accretion of dense filamentary flows. With high accretion rate ~2 Msun/yr, the protostar is expected to turn into a SMS within its lifetime, eventually collapsing to a seed for the supermassive black hole observed in the early Universe at z~7.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.