Paper detail

Formation and decay of Bose-Einstein condensates in an excited band of a double-well optical lattice

We study the formation and collision-aided decay of an ultra-cold atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in the first excited band of a double-well 2D-optical lattice with weak harmonic confinement in the perpendicular $z$ direction. This lattice geometry is based on an experiment by Wirth et al. The double well is asymmetric, with the local ground state in the shallow well nearly degenerate with the first excited state of the adjacent deep well. We compare the band structure obtained from a tight-binding (TB) model with that obtained numerically using a plane wave basis. We find the TB model to be in quantitative agreement for the lowest two bands, qualitative for next two bands, and inadequate for even higher bands. The band widths of the excited bands are much larger than the harmonic oscillator energy spacing in the $z$ direction. We then study the thermodynamics of a non-interacting Bose gas in the first excited band. We estimate the condensate fraction and critical temperature, $T_c$, as functions of lattice parameters. For typical atom numbers, the critical energy $k_BT_c$, with $k_B$ the Boltzmann constant, is larger than the excited band widths and harmonic oscillator energy. Using conservation of total energy and atom number, we show that the temperature increases after the lattice transformation. Finally, we estimate the time scale for a two-body collision-aided decay of the condensate as a function of lattice parameters. The decay involves two processes, the dominant one in which both colliding atoms decay to the ground band, and the second involving excitation of one atom to a higher band. For this estimate, we have used TB wave functions for the lowest four bands, and numerical estimates for higher bands. The decay rate rapidly increases with lattice depth, but stays smaller than the tunneling rate between the $s$ and $p$ orbitals in adjacent wells.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.