Paper detail

Formation and coalescence of relativistic binary stars: effect of kick velocity

Galactic binary pulsars with different companion types (OB-star, white dwarf (WD), neutron star (NS), black hole (BH), or planet) assuming various phenomenological distributions for kick velocities of newborn NS are studied. The merging rates of relativistic binary stars (NS+NS, NS+BH, BH+BH) dependence on the kick velocity is specially adresed. The BH+BH merging is shown to occur, depending on parameters of BH formation, at a rate of one per 200,000 -- 500,000 years in a Milky Way type galaxy. The NS+NS merging rate $R_{ns}$ is found to be 1 per \sim 3,000 years for zero recoil, and decrease to one per 10,000 years even for the highest kick velocities of 400 km/s. That the merging rates derived from evolutionary calculations are by two order of magnitude higher than those based on binary pulsar statistics only, is suggested to be due to the fact that the observable binary pulsars in pairs with NS form only a fraction of the total number of binary NS systems. The expected detection rate of binary BH by a LIGO-type gravitational wave detector comparable with and even higher than the binary NS merging rate for a wide range of parameters.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.