Paper detail

Formalization of Amicable Numbers Theory

This paper presents a formalization of the theory of amicable numbers in the Lean~4 proof assistant. Two positive integers $m$ and $n$ are called an amicable pair if the sum of proper divisors of $m$ equals $n$ and the sum of proper divisors of $n$ equals $m$. Our formalization introduces the proper divisor sum function $\propersum(n) = σ(n) - n$, defines the concepts of amicable pairs and amicable numbers, and computationally verifies historically famous amicable pairs. Furthermore, we formalize basic structural theorems, including symmetry, non-triviality, and connections to abundant/deficient numbers. A key contribution is the complete formal proof of the classical Thābit formula (9th century), using index-shifting and the \texttt{zify} tactic. Additionally, we provide complete formal proofs of both Thābit's rule and Euler's generalized rule (1747), two fundamental theorems for generating amicable pairs. A major achievement is the first complete formalization of the Borho-Hoffmann breeding method (1986), comprising 540 lines with 33 theorems and leveraging automated algebra tactics (\texttt{zify} and \texttt{ring}) to verify complex polynomial identities. We also formalize extensions including sociable numbers (aliquot cycles), betrothed numbers (quasi-amicable pairs), parity constraint theorems, and computational search bounds for coprime pairs ($>10^{65}$). We verify the smallest sociable cycle of length 5 (Poulet's cycle) and computationally verify specific instances. The formalization comprises 2076 lines of Lean code organized into Mathlib-candidate and paper-specific modules, with 139 theorems and all necessary infrastructure for divisor sum multiplicativity and coprimality reasoning.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.