Paper detail

Formal duality in finite cyclic groups

The notion of formal duality in finite Abelian groups appeared recently in relation to spherical designs, tight sphere packings, and energy minimizing configurations in Euclidean spaces. For finite cyclic groups it is conjectured that there are no primitive formally dual pairs besides the trivial one and the TITO configuration. This conjecture has been verified for cyclic groups of prime power order, as well as of square-free order. In this paper, we will confirm the conjecture for other classes of cyclic groups, namely almost all cyclic groups of order a product of two prime powers, with finitely many exceptions for each pair of primes, or whose order $N$ satisfies $p\mid\!\mid N$, where $p$ a prime satisfying the so-called self-conjugacy property with respect to $N$. For the above proofs, various tools were needed: the field descent method, used chiefly for the circulant Hadamard conjecture, the techniques of Coven & Meyerowitz for sets that tile $\mathbb{Z}$ or $\mathbb{Z}_N$ by translations, dubbed herein as the polynomial method, as well as basic number theory of cyclotomic fields, especially the splitting of primes in a given cyclotomic extension.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.