Paper detail

Forged in FIRE: cusps, cores, and baryons in low-mass dwarf galaxies

We present ultra-high resolution cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of $M_*\simeq10^{4-6.3}M_{\odot}$ dwarf galaxies that form within $M_{v}=10^{9.5-10}M_{\odot}$ dark matter halos. Our simulations rely on the FIRE implementation of star formation feedback and were run with high enough force and mass resolution to directly resolve stellar and dark matter structure on the ~200 pc scales of interest for classical and ultra-faint dwarfs in the Local Group. The resultant galaxies sit on the $M_*$ vs. $M_{v}$ relation required to match the Local Group stellar mass function. They have bursty star formation histories and also form with half-light radii and metallicities that broadly match those observed for local dwarfs at the same stellar mass. We demonstrate that it is possible to create a large (~1 kpc) dark matter core in a cosmological simulation of an $M_*\simeq10^{6.5}M_{\odot}$ dwarf galaxy that resides within an $M_{v}=10^{10}M_{\odot}$ halo -- precisely the scale of interest for resolving the Too Big to Fail problem. However, these large cores are not ubiquitous and appear to correlate closely with the star formation histories of the dwarfs: dark matter cores are largest in systems that form their stars late ($z\lesssim2$), after the early epoch of cusp building mergers has ended. Our $M_*\simeq10^4M_{\odot}$ dwarf retains a cuspy dark matter halo density profile that matches almost identically that of a dark-matter only run of the same system. Despite forming in a field environment, this very low mass dwarf has observable properties that match closely to those of ultra-faint satellite galaxies of the Milky Way, including a uniformly old stellar population (>10 Gyr). Though ancient, most of the stars in our ultra-faint form after reionization; the UV field acts mainly to suppress fresh gas accretion, not to boil away gas that is already present in the proto-dwarf.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.