Paper detail

Forecasts of cosmological constraints from HI intensity mapping with FAST, BINGO & SKA-I

We forecast the cosmological constraints of the neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping (IM) technique with radio telescopes by assuming 1-year of observational time. The current and future radio telescopes we consider here are FAST (Five hundred meter Aperture Spherical Telescope), BINGO (Baryon acoustic oscillations In Neutral Gas Observations), and SKA-I (Square Kilometre Array phase I) single-dish experiment. We also forecast the combined constraints of the three radio telescopes with Planck. We find that, the $1 σ$ errors of $(w_{0}, w_{a})$ for BINGO, FAST and SKA-I with respect to the fiducial values are respectively, $(0.9293, 3.5792), (0.4083, 1.5878), (0.3158, 0.4622)$. This is equivalent to $(56.04\%, 55.64\%)$ and $(66.02\%, 87.09\%)$ improvements in constraining $(w_{0}, w_{a})$ for FAST and SKA-I relative to BINGO. Simulations further show that SKA-I will put more stringent constraints than both FAST and BINGO when each of the experiment is combined with Planck measurement. For the $9$ cosmological parameters in consideration, we find that, there is a trade-off between SKA-I and FAST in constraining cosmological parameters, with each experiment being more superior in constraining a particular set of parameters.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.