Paper detail

Forecasting Chemical Abundance Precision for Extragalactic Stellar Archaeology

Increasingly powerful and multiplexed spectroscopic facilities promise detailed chemical abundance patterns for millions of resolved stars in galaxies beyond the Milky Way (MW). Here, we employ the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) to forecast the precision to which stellar abundances for metal-poor, low-mass stars outside the MW can be measured for 41 current (e.g., Keck, MMT, VLT, DESI) and planned (e.g., MSE, JWST, ELTs) spectrograph configurations. We show that moderate resolution ($R\lesssim5000$) spectroscopy at blue-optical wavelengths ($λ\lesssim4500$ Å) (i) enables the recovery of 2-4 times as many elements as red-optical spectroscopy ($5000\lesssimλ\lesssim10000$ Å) at similar or higher resolutions ($R\sim 10000$) and (ii) can constrain the abundances of several neutron capture elements to $\lesssim$0.3 dex. We further show that high-resolution ($R\gtrsim 20000$), low S/N ($\sim$10 pixel$^{-1}$) spectra contain rich abundance information when modeled with full spectral fitting techniques. We demonstrate that JWST/NIRSpec and ELTs can recover (i) $\sim$10 and 30 elements, respectively, for metal-poor red giants throughout the Local Group and (ii) [Fe/H] and [$α$/Fe] for resolved stars in galaxies out to several Mpc with modest integration times. We show that select literature abundances are within a factor of $\sim$2 (or better) of our CRLBs. We suggest that, like ETCs, CRLBs should be used when planning stellar spectroscopic observations. We include an open source python package, \texttt{Chem-I-Calc}, that allows users to compute CRLBs for spectrographs of their choosing.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.