Paper detail

Forecasting and Uncertainty in Modeling the 2014-2015 Ebola Epidemic in West Africa

The Ebola epidemic in West Africa is the largest ever recorded, with over 27,000 cases and 11,000 deaths as of June 2015. The public health response was challenged by difficulties with disease surveillance, which impacted subsequent analysis and decision-making regarding optimal interventions. We developed a stage-structured model of Ebola virus disease (EVD). A key feature of the model is that it includes a generalized correction term accounting for factors such as the fraction of cases reported and fraction of the population at risk (e.g. due to contact patterns, interventions, spatiotemporal spread, pre-existing immunity, asymptomatic cases, etc.). We generated a range of short-term forecasts for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, which we then validated using subsequent data. We also used the model to examine the uncertainty in the relative contributions to transmission by the different stages of infection (early, late, and funeral). We found that a wide range of forecasted trajectories fit approximately equally well to the early data. However, by including the correction factor term the best-fit models correctly forecasted EVD activity for all three countries, both individually and for all countries combined. In particular, the model correctly forecasted the slow-down in Liberia, as well as the continued exponential growth in Sierra Leone through November 2014. Parameter unidentifiability issues hindered estimation of the relative contributions of each stage of transmission from incidence and deaths data alone, which poses a challenge in determining optimal intervention strategies, and underscores the need for additional data collection. Even with these limited data, however, it is still possible to accurately capture and predict the epidemic dynamics by using a simplified correction term that approximately accounts for the complex underlying factors driving disease spread.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.