Paper detail

Forcing Posets with Large Dimension to Contain Large Standard Examples

The dimension of a poset $P$, denoted $\dim(P)$, is the least positive integer $d$ for which $P$ is the intersection of $d$ linear extensions of $P$. The maximum dimension of a poset $P$ with $|P|\le 2n+1$ is $n$, provided $n\ge2$, and this inequality is tight when $P$ contains the standard example $S_n$. However, there are posets with large dimension that do not contain the standard example $S_2$. Moreover, for each fixed $d\ge2$, if $P$ is a poset with $|P|\le 2n+1$ and $P$ does not contain the standard example $S_d$, then $\dim(P)=o(n)$. Also, for large $n$, there is a poset $P$ with $|P|=2n$ and $\dim(P)\ge (1-o(1))n$ such that the largest $d$ so that $P$ contains the standard example $S_d$ is $o(n)$. In this paper, we will show that for every integer $c\ge1$, there is an integer $f(c)=O(c^2)$ so that for large enough $n$, if $P$ is a poset with $|P|\le 2n+1$ and $\dim(P)\ge n-c$, then $P$ contains a standard example $S_d$ with $d\ge n-f(c)$. From below, we show that $f(c)=Ω(c^{4/3})$. On the other hand, we also prove an analogous result for fractional dimension, and in this setting $f(c)$ is linear in $c$. Here the result is best possible up to the value of the multiplicative constant.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.