Paper detail

Forbidden island heights in stress-driven coherent Stranski-Krastanov growth

The observed height distribution of clusters obtained in strained epitaxy has been often interpreted in terms of electronic effects. We show that some aspects can be explained classically by the interplay of strain and edge energies. We find that soft materials can transform directly from monolayer into thicker islands by two-dimensional (2D) multilayer nucleation and growth. There is a critical thickness decreasing with the force constant. Thinner islands are thermodynamically forbidden, due to the insufficient stress relaxation upon clustering particularly under tensile stress. At sufficiently large misfits the barrier for 2D multilayer nucleation is significantly smaller than the barrier for subsequent single-layer nucleation. The effects are found to be quantitatively reasonable and offer a plausible explanation for the absence of thin islands and 2D growth of flattop islands usually attributed to quantum size effects.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.