Paper detail

Fonctions L de paires pour les groupes classiques

Let $π$ be a square integrable representation of a classical group and let $ρ$ be a cuspidal representation of a general linear group. We can define in two different ways an L-function $L(ρ\times π,s)$: first we can use the Langlands parametrization at each places which is now available, thanks to Arthur's work, and secondly we can transfer $π$ to a general linear group, using the twisted endoscopy as established by Arthur. In this paper, we compare the two definitions and we prove, as expected, that the first one has less poles that the second one. Assuming that $π$ is cuspidal, we link the poles of the first L-function to the poles of the Eisensteins series and when $ρ$ is a quadratic character and when the groupe is a special orthogonal group, we also link theses poles with the theta lifts. We have some hypothesis at the archimedean places.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.