Paper detail

Folding Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Transmembrane Peptides of Influenza A, B M2, and MERS-, SARS-CoV E Viral Proteins

Viroporins are small viral proteins that oligomerize in the membrane of host cells and induce the formation of hydrophilic pores in these membranes, thus altering the physiological properties of the host cells. Due to their significance for viral pathogenicity, they have become targets for pharmaceutical intervention, especially through compounds that block their pore-forming activity. Here we add to the growing literature concerning the structure and function of viroporins by studying and comparing -- through molecular dynamics simulations -- the folding of the transmembrane domain peptides of viroporins derived from four viruses : influenza A, influenza B, and the coronaviruses MERS-Cov-2 and SARS-CoV-2. Through a total of more than 50 μs of simulation time in explicit solvent (TFE) and with full electrostatics, we characterize the folding behavior, helical stability and helical propensity of these transmembrane peptides in their monomeric state and we identify common motifs that may reflect their quaternary organization and/or biological function. We show that the two influenza-derived peptides are significantly different in peptide sequence and secondary structure from the two coronavirus-derived peptides, and that they are organized in two structurally distinct parts : a significantly more stable N-terminal half, and a fast converting C-terminal half that continuously folds and unfolds between $α$-helical structures and non-canonical structures which are mostly turns. In contrast, the two coronavirus-derived transmembrane peptides are much more stable and fast helix formers when compared with the influenza ones. We discuss possible interpretations of these findings and their putative connection to the structural characteristics of the respective viroporins.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.