Paper detail

Folding instabilities in non-Newtonian viscous sheets: shear thinning and shear thickening effects

In this work, we extend the analyses devoted to Newtonian viscous fluids previously reported by Ribe [Physical Review E 68, 036305 (2003)], by investigating shear thickening (dilatant) and shear thinning (pseudoplastic) effects on the development of folding instabilities in non-Newtonian viscous sheets of which viscosity is given by a power-law constitutive equation. Such instabilities are trigged by compression stresses acting on viscous sheets that leave a channel at a very small initial velocity, fall, and then hit a solid surface or a fluid substrate. Our study is conducted through a mixed approach combining direct numerical simulations, energy budget analyses, scaling laws, and experiments. The numerical results are based on an adaptive variational multi-scale method for multiphase flows, while Carpobol gel sheets are considered for the conducted experiments. Two folding regimes are observed: (1) the viscous regime; and (2) the gravitational one. Interestingly, only the latter is affected by shear thinning/thickening manifestations within the material. In short, when gravity is balanced by viscous forces along the non-Newtonian viscous sheet, both the folding amplitude and the folding frequency are given by a power-law function of the sheet slenderness, the Galileo number (the ratio of the gravitational stress to the viscous one), and the flow behaviour index. Highly shear thickening materials develop large amplitude (and low frequency) instabilities, which, in contrast, tend to be suppressed by shear thinning effects, and eventually cease. Lastly, nonNewtonian effects on folding onset/cessation are also carefully explored. As a result, non-Newtonian folding onset and cessation criteria are presented.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.