Paper detail

Fokker-Planck Models of Star Clusters with Anisotropic Velocity Distributions. II. Post-Collapse Evolution

The evolution of spherical single-mass star clusters driven by two-body relaxation was followed beyond core collapse by numerically solving the orbit-averaged Fokker-Planck equation in energy--angular momentum space. The heating effect by three-body binaries was incorporated in the Fokker-Planck models. The development of velocity anisotropy after the core collapse is discussed in detail. The anisotropy in the outer regions continues to increase slowly after the collapse. In clusters comprising a relatively small number of stars ($N \ltsim 10000$), the post-collapse expansion is nearly self-similar and the anisotropy at each of inner Lagrangian radii is nearly constant. In clusters comprising a larger number of stars ($N \gtsim 10000$), gravothermal oscillations occur and the anisotropy at each of the inner radii oscillates with the core oscillations. There is no qualitative difference in the nature of the gravothermal oscillations between the isotropic and anisotropic Fokker-Planck models.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.