Paper detail

Focused Proofreading: Efficiently Extracting Connectomes from Segmented EM Images

Identifying complex neural circuitry from electron microscopic (EM) images may help unlock the mysteries of the brain. However, identifying this circuitry requires time-consuming, manual tracing (proofreading) due to the size and intricacy of these image datasets, thus limiting state-of-the-art analysis to very small brain regions. Potential avenues to improve scalability include automatic image segmentation and crowd sourcing, but current efforts have had limited success. In this paper, we propose a new strategy, focused proofreading, that works with automatic segmentation and aims to limit proofreading to the regions of a dataset that are most impactful to the resulting circuit. We then introduce a novel workflow, which exploits biological information such as synapses, and apply it to a large dataset in the fly optic lobe. With our techniques, we achieve significant tracing speedups of 3-5x without sacrificing the quality of the resulting circuit. Furthermore, our methodology makes the task of proofreading much more accessible and hence potentially enhances the effectiveness of crowd sourcing.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.