Paper detail

Fock-Goncharov conjecture and polyhedral cones for $U \subset SL_n$ and base affine space $SL_n /U$

I prove several conjectures of \cite{GHKK} on the cluster structure of $SL_n$, which in particular imply the full Fock-Goncharov conjecture for the open double Bruhat cell $\mathcal{A} \subset SL_n/U$, for $U \subset SL_n$ a maximal unipotent subgroup. This endows the mirror cluster variety $\mathcal{X}$ with a canonical potential function $W$, and determines a canonical cone $W^T \geq 0 \subset \mathcal{X}\left(\mathbb{R}^T\right)$ of the mirror tropical space, whose integer points parametrize a basis of $H^0\left(SL_n/U,\mathcal{O}_{SL_n/U}\right)$, canonically determined by the open subset $\mathcal{A} \subset SL_n/U$. Each choice of seed identifies $\mathcal{X}\left(\mathbb{R}^T\right)$ with a real vector space, and $W^T \geq 0$ with a system of linear equations with integer coefficients, cutting out a polyhedral cone. We obtain in this way (generally) infinitely many parameterizations of the canonical basis as integer points of a polyhedral cone. For the usual initial seed of the double Bruhat cell, we recover the parametrizations of Berenstein-Kazhdan\cite{BKaz,BKaz2} and Berenstein-Zelevinsky\cite{BZ96} by integer points of the Gelfand-Tsetlin cone.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.