Paper detail

Fly-automata, model-checking and recognizability

The Recognizability Theorem states that if a set of finite graphs is definable by a monadic second-order (MSO) sentence, then it is recognizable with respect to the graph algebra upon which the definition of clique-width is based. Recognizability is an algebraic notion, defined in terms of congruences that can also be formulated by means of finite automata on the terms that describe the considered graphs. This theorem entails that the verification of MSO graph properties, or equivalently, the model-checking problem for MSO logic over finite binary relational structures, is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) for the parameter consisting of the formula that expresses the property and the clique-width (or the tree-width) of the input graph or structure. The corresponding algorithms can be implemented by means of fly-automata whose transitions are computed on the fly and not tabulated. We review two versions of recognizability, we present fly-automata by means of examples showing that they can also compute values attached to graphs. We show that fly-automata with infinite sets of states yield a simple proof of the strong version of the Recognizability Theorem. This proof has not been published previously.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.