Paper detail

Fluxoid fluctuations in mesoscopic superconducting rings

Rings are a model system for studying phase coherence in one dimension. Superconducting rings have states with uniform phase windings that are integer multiples of 2$π$ called fluxoid states. When the energy difference between these fluxoid states is of order the temperature so that phase slips are energetically accessible, several states contribute to the ring's magnetic response to a flux threading the ring in thermal equilibrium and cause a suppression or downturn in the ring's magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature. We review the theoretical framework for superconducting fluctuations in rings including a model developed by Koshnick$^1$ which includes only fluctuations in the ring's phase winding number called fluxoid fluctuations and a complete model by von Oppen and Riedel$^2$ that includes all thermal fluctuations in the Ginzburg-Landau framework. We show that for sufficiently narrow and dirty rings the two models predict a similar susceptibility response with a slightly shifted Tc indicating that fluxoid fluctuations are dominant. Finally we present magnetic susceptibility data for rings with different physical parameters which demonstrate the applicability of our models. The susceptibility data spans a region in temperature where the ring transitions from a hysteretic to a non hysteretic response to a periodic applied magnetic field. The magnetic susceptibility data, taken where transitions between fluxoid states are slow compared to the measurement time scale and the ring response was hysteretic, decreases linearly with increasing temperature resembling a mean field response with no fluctuations. At higher temperatures where fluctuations begin to play a larger role a crossover occurs and the non-hysteretic data shows a fluxoid fluctuation induced suppression of diamagnetism below the mean field response that agrees well with the models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.