Paper detail

Flux qubits shed a new light on BCS theory and high-$T_c$ superconductivity

A simple microscopic model of a small superconducting loop interrupted by Josephson junction (flux qubit) allows to compute from the experimental data of Wal et.al \cite{Wal} an important parameter - the density of Cooper pairs at zero temperature. This density is determined by the cut-off energy in the BCS model and agrees with the original BCS suggestion but is lower by two orders of magnitude than the value accepted in the modern literature. The immediate consequences of this result are: the validity of the strong coupling BCS model, a plausible picture of electrons recombination into Cooper pairs, and a much weaker condition for the appearance of high-temperature superconductivity. Another consequence is that the popular interpretation of Josephson qubits as macroscopic quantum systems is replaced by a picture of qubit states being superpositions of the ground state and the state containing only a single excited Cooper pair.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.