Paper detail

Fluorescence fluctuations-based super-resolution microscopy techniques: an experimental comparative study

Fluorescence fluctuations-based super-resolution microscopy (FF-SRM) is an emerging field promising low-cost and live-cell compatible imaging beyond the resolution of conventional optical microscopy. A comprehensive overview on how the nature of fluctuations, label density, out-of-focus light, sub-cellular dynamics, and the sample itself influence the reconstruction in FF-SRM is crucial to design appropriate biological experiments. We have experimentally compared several of the recently developed FF-SRM techniques (namely ESI, bSOFI, SRRF, SACD, MUSICAL and HAWK) on widefield fluorescence image sequences of a diverse set of samples (namely liposomes, tissues, fixed and living cells), and on three-dimensional simulated data where the ground truth is available. The simulated microscopy data showed that the different techniques have different requirements for signal fluctuation to achieve their optimal performance. While different levels of signal fluctuations had little effect on the SRRF, ESI and SACD images, image reconstructions from both bSOFI and MUSICAL displayed a substantial improvement in their noise rejection, z-sectioning, and overall super-resolution capabilities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.