Paper detail

Fluid-structure interaction of multi-body systems: Methodology and applications

We present a method for computing fluid-structure interaction problems for multi-body systems. The fluid flow equations are solved using a fractional-step method with the immersed boundary method proposed by Uhlmann [J. Comput Phys. 209 (2005) 448]. The equations of the rigid bodies are solved using recursive algorithms proposed by Felis [Auton. Robot 41 (2017) 495]. The two systems of equations are weakly coupled so that the resulting method is cost-effective. The accuracy of the method is demonstrated by comparison with two- and three-dimensional cases from the literature: the flapping of a flexible airfoil, the self-propulsion of a plunging flexible plate, and the flapping of a flag in a free stream. As an illustration of the capabilities of the proposed method, two three-dimensional bio-inspired applications are presented: an extension to three dimensions of the plunging flexible plate and a simple model of spider ballooning.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.