Paper detail

Fluid-structure interaction of a bio-inspired passively deployable flap for lift enhancement

Birds have a remarkable ability to perform complex maneuvers at post-stall angles of attack. The passive deployment of self-actuating covert feathers in response to unsteady flow separation while performing such maneuvers provides a passive flow control paradigm for these aerodynamic capabilities. Most studies involving covert-feathers-inspired passive flow control have modeled the feathers as a rigidly attached or a freely moving flap on a wing. A flap mounted via a torsional spring enables a configuration more emblematic of the finite stiffness associated with the covert-feather dynamics. The performance benefits and flow physics associated with this more general case remain largely unexplored. In this work, we model covert feathers as a passively deployable, torsionally hinged flap on the suction surface of a stationary airfoil. We numerically investigate this airfoil-flap system at a low Reynolds number of $Re=1{,}000$ and angle of attack of $20^\circ$ by performing high-fidelity nonlinear simulations using a projection-based immersed boundary method. A parametric study performed by varying the stiffness of the spring, mass of the flap and location of the hinge yielded lift improvements as high as 27% relative to the baseline flap-less case and revealed two dominant flow behavioral regimes. A detailed analysis revealed that the stiffness-dependent mean flap deflection and inertia-dependent amplitude and phase of flap oscillations altered the dominant flow characteristics in both the regimes. Of special interest for performance benefits were the flap parameters that enhanced the lift-conducive leading-edge vortex while weakening the trailing-edge vortex and associated detrimental effect of upstream propagation of reverse flow. These parameters also yielded a favorable temporal synchronization of flap oscillations with the vortex-shedding process in both regimes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.