Paper detail

Fluctuations in the IRAS 1.2 Jy Catalogue

An analysis of the IRAS 1.2 Jy redshift catalogue with emphasis on the separate examination of northern and southern parts (in galactic coordinates) is performed using a complete set of morphological descriptors (Minkowski functionals), nearest neighbour distributions and the variance of the galaxy counts. We find large fluctuations in the clustering properties as seen in a large difference between the northern and southern parts of the catalogue on scales of 100Mpc/h. These fluctuations remain discernible even on the scale of 200Mpc/h. We also identify sparse sampling as a major source of ``apparent homogenization''. Tests on observational selection effects concerning luminosity, colour and redshift-space distortion support the significance of these large-scale fluctuations.

preprint1998arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.