Paper detail

Flow similarity, stochastic branching, and quarter power scaling in plants

The origin of allometric scaling patterns that are multiples of 1/4 has long fascinated biologists. While not universal, scaling relationships with exponents that are close to multiples of 1/4 are common and have been described in all major clades. Foremost among these relationships is the 3/4 scaling of metabolism with mass which underpins the 1/4 power dependence of biological rates and times. Several models have been advanced to explain the underlying mechanistic drivers of such patterns, but questions regarding a disconnect between model structures and empirical data have limited their widespread acceptance. Notable among these is a fractal branching model which predicts power law scaling of both metabolism and physical dimensions. While a power law is a useful first approximation to many datasets, non-linearity in some large data compilations suggest the possibility of more complex or alternative mechanisms. Here, we first show that quarter power scaling can be derived using only the preservation of volume flow rate and velocity as model constraints. Applying our model to the specific case of land plants, we show that incorporating biomechanical principles and allowing different parts of plant branching networks to be optimized to serve different functions predicts non-linearity in allometric relationships, and helps explain why interspecific scaling exponents covary along a fractal continuum. We also demonstrate that while branching may be a stochastic process, due to the conservation of volume, data may still be consistent with the expectations for a fractal network when one examines subtrees within a tree. Data from numerous sources at the level of plant shoots, stems, petioles, and leaves show strong agreement with our model predictions. This novel theoretical framework provides an easily testable alternative to current general models of plant metabolic allometry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.