Paper detail

Flow-Cut Gaps for Integer and Fractional Multiflows

Consider a routing problem consisting of a demand graph H and a supply graph G. If the pair obeys the cut condition, then the flow-cut gap for this instance is the minimum value C such that there is a feasible multiflow for H if each edge of G is given capacity C. The flow-cut gap can be greater than 1 even when G is the (series-parallel) graph K_{2,3}. In this paper we are primarily interested in the "integer" flow-cut gap. What is the minimum value C such that there is a feasible integer valued multiflow for H if each edge of G is given capacity C? We conjecture that the integer flow-cut gap is quantitatively related to the fractional flow-cut gap. This strengthens the well-known conjecture that the flow-cut gap in planar and minor-free graphs is O(1) to suggest that the integer flow-cut gap is O(1). We give several results on non-trivial special classes of graphs supporting this conjecture and further explore the "primal" method for understanding flow-cut gaps. Our results include: - Let G be obtained by series-parallel operations starting from an edge st, and consider orienting all edges in G in the direction from s to t. A demand is compliant if its endpoints are joined by a directed path in the resulting oriented graph. If the cut condition holds for a compliant instance and G+H is Eulerian, then an integral routing of H exists. - The integer flow-cut gap in series-parallel graphs is 5. We also give an explicit class of instances that shows via elementary calculations that the flow-cut gap in series-parallel graphs is at least 2-o(1); this simplifies the proof by Lee and Raghavendra. - The integer flow-cut gap in k-Outerplanar graphs is c^{O(k)} for some fixed constant c. - A simple proof that the flow-cut gap is O(\log k^*) where k^* is the size of a node-cover in H; this was previously shown by Günlük via a more intricate proof.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.