Paper detail

Flow Characterization in Triply-Periodic-Minimal-Surface (TPMS) based Porous Geometries: Part 1 -- Hydrodynamics

The modeling of flow and heat transfer in porous media systems have always been a challenge and, the extended Darcy transport models for flow and equilibrium and non-equilibrium energy models for heat transfer are being used for macro-level analysis, however, the limitations of these models are subjected to porous geometry. The forced convective flow of an incompressible viscous fluid through a channel filled with four different types of porous geometries constructed using the Triply-Periodic-Minimal-Surface (or TPMS) model, are presented in this study. Four TPMS lattice shapes namely; Diamond, I-WP, Primitive, and Gyroid are created with identical porosity, and three different types of porous media are further generated for each porous geometry to investigate the relationship of shape-tortuosity, microporosity, and pore size on permeability and inertial drag factors. A pore-scale direct numerical simulation approach is performed for the first two types of porous media by solving the Navier-Stokes equations. The specific microporosity is quantitatively induced in the solid region where Darcy-Forchheimer-Brinkman model is solved, whereas the Navier-Stokes equations is solved for the fluid region in the third type of porous media. The results reveal that the validity of Darcy flow regime is very narrow up to Re ~ 4 for the Primitive lattice (Type 1) while for Diamond lattice (Type 2), it extends up to Re ~ 20. For Re > 20, Darcy regime is not valid for any lattice types. For lower porosity (Type 1, ε = 0.32) the inertial drag is found to be minimum in I-WP lattice and maximum in Gyroid lattice while, for higher porosity ( Type 2, ε ~ 1), Primitive lattice has minimum and I-WP lattice has maximum value of inertial drag, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.