Paper detail

Floor- or ceiling-sliding for chemically active, gyrotactic, sedimenting Janus particles

Surface bound catalytic chemical reactions self-propel chemically active Janus particles. In the vicinity of boundaries, these particles exhibit rich behavior, such as the occurrence of wall-bound steady states of "sliding". Most active particles tend to sediment as they are density mismatched with the solution. Moreover Janus spheres, which consist of an inert core material decorated with a cap-like, thin layer of a catalyst, are gyrotactic ("bottom-heavy"). Occurrence of sliding states near the horizontal walls depends on the interplay between the active motion and the gravity-driven sedimentation and alignment. It is thus important to understand and quantify the influence of these gravity-induced effects on the behavior of model chemically active particles moving near walls. For model gyrotactic, self-phoretic Janus particles, here we study theoretically the occurrence of sliding states at horizontal planar walls that are either below ("floor") or above ("ceiling") the particle. We construct "state diagrams" characterizing the occurrence of such states as a function of the sedimentation velocity and of the gyrotactic response of the particle, as well as of the phoretic mobility of the particle. We show that in certain cases sliding states may emerge simultaneously at both the ceiling and the floor, while the larger part of the experimentally relevant parameter space corresponds to particles that would exhibit sliding states only either at the floor or at the ceiling or there are no sliding states at all. These predictions are critically compared with the results of previous experimental studies and our experiments conducted on Pt-coated polystyrene and silica-core particles suspended in aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.